N.G.O Scans Heart of Punjab Police.

Punjab Inspector General of Police, Ms. Gurpreet Deo lead his team for a Heart Care Camp organised by NGO Disha – The Harbinger of Social Change & Development in collaboration with Kare Partners heart centre Chandigarh  at the Sector – 9 Police Headquarters. The Two – Day camp concluded here today.

 

Smt. Simrit Joshan, President and Smt. Lata Dua Secretary of Disha NGO along with the team of Doctors and Technicians from Heart Kare Partners including Gauravjit Singh operation head at  kare partners Dr. Ashootosh Bhardwaj, Dr. Gurpreet and Subash Dadwal with his team; conducted E.C.G and other blood tests of over 200 police personnel, during the two days of the camp.

 

The exercise was undertaken as a preventive measure to create awareness of proper care of heart diseases caused due to sedentary lifestyle and precautions to avoid chronic disorders. The good health of a policeman ensures efficiency and better services to the community.

 

Ms. Gurpreet Deo, IG hoped to extend such programs to the other establishments as well, all over the state.

 

Read More

World Social Work Day Celebrated at Panjab University.

 

“Professional Social Workers’ primary role is to bring about Social Change”, said Dr. Sherry Sabbarawal, Chairperson of the Centre for Social Work, Panjab University, while Inaugurating and delivering a Keynote address on the World Social Work Day Celebrations, organised in collaboration with NGO Disha – The Harbinger of Social Change & Development at Panjab University today.

Dr. Monica Munjial presented the Historical perspective of Social Work in India. Smt. Simrit Joshan, president of Disha along with the Chief Guest felicitated the volunteers, donors and supporters, associated with NGO Disha, during the year in organizing various activities like Summer Camp for Children, Health Camps, Awareness Programs; Reading and Recording audio books for the blind; and providing a helping hand to the Disabled as support; were distributed Certificates of Appreciation on this occasion.

A large number of students from the Punjab Engineering College University, Research scholars, Post Graduation Students and Students of Indira Gandhi National Open University took active part in the knowledge sharing session on Professional Social Work and Philanthropy.

 

 

Read More

Why middle class India hates NGOs

World NGO Day, February 27, though observed by several agencies and institutions across the globe is yet to adopted as an international day by the United Nations General Assembly.

However, even if it were, middle class India would at best have mixed views about dedicating a day to acknowledging and celebrating the work NGOs do. For, the middle class-NGO engagement is complicated and has a chequered history.

Until the late 1980s, middle class Indians did not particularly mind NGOs, unless its own progeny decided to commit career suicide by joining one. NGOs operated in the peripheral visual field, in villages and slums, and did things it felt petty to question. Organising health camps, teaching children, promoting handicrafts, distributing relief, etc. Orbital overlaps were few – mostly when a donation-seeker appeared at the doorstep – and vaguely amiable. Save for Emergency-era movements, news of NGOs skirmishing with authority was rare, and seen as a little release of steam, nothing to be unduly perturbed about.

A number of coherent and strident voices, most headline-grabbing of who was Medha Patkar and the Narmada Bachao Andolan, would change all that. Punching much above their numerical strength, this new breed of NGOs refused to stick to traditional niches and was not to be limited with roles in implementing government programmes either; they were challenging the development paradigm itself.

Patkar and Co, for example, went beyond the fairness of resettlement and rehabilitation packages and questioned the raison d’etre of big dams themselves. NGOs had asked inconvenient questions of the government before too, but this was qualitatively different.

A sub-group, small but forceful, had discarded the gloves and was itching for proper battle.

Always wary of disaffection spread and not as clueless as the middle class about the NGO power, the government retaliated with anti-NGO propaganda. A small group of mischief-mongers was blocking India’s progress march with moral and financial support from foreign powers, it alleged.

Surely, it was anti-development to protest projects meant to deliver power to homes and factories and water to fields and, surely it was treasonous to whine about the nation’s problems in international fora.

Redistribution of government largesse and international embarrassment are among the middle class’s top fears in any context. Unsurprisingly then that this anti-NGO propaganda found greatest resonance among it.

More negative shades came to be added to the portraiture in time.

With new fangled ideas of participation gaining currency in the 1990s and its own personnel not really queuing up for the task of cajoling communities, the government had been prompted to envisage greater roles for NGOs in local planning and implementation.

However not all “partner” NGOs were keen to settle into contractor-type arrangements (read shady quid pro quos) and a handle was needed over them too. So, programme guidelines were drafted such that there was no ambiguity on who was wearing the pants in the government-NGO relationship, and an entire list of sticks assembled to wave as needed.

If NGOs confined themselves to a small area, they lacked scale; if they expanded, they were creating empires. If they developed “models”, they were naïve; if they emphasised nuancing implementation approaches to local contexts, their work lacked replicability.

If they invested too much in community-level processes, they did not understand urgency and lacked outcome orientation; if they invested less in community-level processes, they were taking short-cuts.

For middle class Indians, which had already made the journey from seeing NGOs as woolly-headed do-gooders to development saboteurs, the spin about NGO ineptitude and corruption was easy to accept.

To be accurate, the NGO sector is far from perfect and corruption within it is a genuine problem, but it is clear that a blinkered middle class has focussed largely on the darker end of a large colour spectrum. And the shades have only darkened in these hypernationalistic times.

At the heart of middle class Indians’ contempt for NGOs lies the fear that NGO action may at some point in time achieve the re-setting of power balances and the re-ordering of development priorities it aspires to.

Forward movement on agendas of women’s empowerment, environment, right to information, etc have already confirmed the threat.

The most telling evidence of the middle class Indians’ fears of privilege usurpation lie in its positive image about the new generation corporate philanthropies and foundations – places where the work has the flavours, in some senses, of the old school NGO. Useful work such as building toilets, planting trees, heritage protection, skill training and research happens, but it is work located within a framework set – and consented to – by the elite.

Nobody is washing the nation’s dirty linen abroad. Nobody is losing it in anger. It is all very gentle, very “civil”. Just people like us giving back what we feel ready to give back.

Meanwhile, the fight for a fundamentally better world is happening in messy spaces we have shut ourselves to.

Read More

Actor Salman Khan’s NGO facing blacklisting!

 

Bollywood star Salman Khan’s Being Human Foundation, a charity outfit that works for the underprivileged in the education and healthcare sectors, is likely to be blacklisted by the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) for not operating a dialysis centre in Bandra.

After issuing two show-cause notices to the NGO last month, the BMC’s health department is now in the process of blacklisting it.

When contacted, an official with Foundation, who did not want to be identified, said: “We do not wish to say anything.”

Dr Padmaja Keskar, BMC’s executive health officer, confirmed that the Foundation is being blacklisted as it has done nothing to start operations at the centre, which has been lying closed and unused since it was set up and handed over to the NGO in 2016. The centre is supposed to offer the medical facility to citizens at minimum cost.

In July 2016, following a tendering process, the NGO was allotted a 250 square metre space at Bandra’s St John Road to run 24 dialysis machines in a public-private partnership basis. “The project was never been implemented. After we sent them a reminder last December, the Foundation responded saying it cannot run the dialysis centre owing to some difficulty,” said Keskar. “We will now issue a notice to blacklist the Foundation.”

The BMC sent two letters to the Bollywood actor’s NGO, on January 6 and January 18, warning the organisation that it would be blacklisted for “showing negligence” after bidding for the project.

As there has been no positive response, the BMC is now refloating tenders for the dialysis centre. Once the Foundation is blacklisted, it cannot bid for the same project again.

Read More

NGO – Justice Sunanda Bhandare Foundation seeks Directives on RPD Act – 2016

Persons with disabilities enjoy a day out at Elliot's beach in Chennai on December 3, 2017.

 

The Supreme Court on Thursday asked all states and union territories (UTs) to implement within three months, the 2016 Act on the rights of persons with disabilities.

A division bench of Justice Arun Mishra and Justice S Abdul Nazeer asked states and UTs to file reports regarding compliance of provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016.

The court’s order came on a plea filed by the Justice Sunanda Bhandare Foundation seeking direction to the Central government and all states to implement the 2016 Act.

During the hearing, Advocate Manali Singhal, appearing for the foundation told the court that Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka, Haryana, Uttarakhand and Lakshadweep have filed affidavit stating compliance of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995. However, the court had sought compliance of 2016 Act.

In 2016, amendments were made in Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 and the apex court had asked states and UTs to implement provisions of new Act.

As compared to the 1995 Act, various new provisions have been included in the 2016 Act and it has expanded the horizon of the rights of such persons, Singhal said.

The apex court had last year asked states to “scrupulously” follow the 2016 Act on the rights of persons with disabilities.

The court had said that 2016 Act is a “sea change in the perception” and exhibits a march forward look with regard to persons with disabilities and roles of state governments, local authorities, educational institutes and companies are given there.

Read More