Highlights of Transgender Bill

The Lok Sabha yesterday passed the Transgender(Protection of Rights) Bill, which seeks to define transgenders and prohibit discrimination against them.

 The Bill, which was introduced in 2016, was passed with 27 amendments, including an amendment on the definition of “transgender”. Originally, the Bill defined transgender as a person who is “neither wholly male or wholly female, or a combination of female or male, or neither female nor male”.

This definition was widely criticised as insensitive. The Standing Committee, to which the Bill was sent for scrutiny, suggested amending the definition of trangender as “transgender person means a person whose gender does not match with the gender assigned to that person at birth and includes trans-man (whether or not such person has undergone sex re-assignment surgery or hormone therapy or laser therapy or such other therapy), person with intersex variations, gender-queer and person having such socio-cultural identities as kinnar, hijra, aaravani and jogta.”.
Yesterday, Union Minister for Social Justice Dr. Thawar Chand Gehlot said that definition has been amended in the Bill as per the recommendation of the Standing Committee. The amended Bill also provides for a definition of “persons with intersex variations” as “who at birth shows variation in his or her primary sexual characteristics, external genitalia, chromosomes or hormones from normative standard of male or female body”
Highlights of the Bill
Prohibition against discrimination : Clause 3 of the Bill prohibits discrimination of transgenders in relation to opportunities for education,
job, health care services, and access to services, accomodation, transport etc.
Right to be recognized as transgender : Clause 4 states that every person has a right to be recognized as a transgender.
recommendations of a District Screening Committee, which will comprise the Chief Medical Officer, District Social Welfare Officer, Psychologist or Psychiatrist, and a representative of transgender community Procedure for transgender recognition : The Bill lays out procedure for recognition as transgender, as per Clauses 6 to 8. The certificate of identity has to be obtained from the District Magistrate, who will issue the certificate based on the
Establishments not to discriminate transgenders : Clause 10 imposes the obligation on establishments to not to discriminate transgenders in
relation to employment, promotion, and other job benefits.
Right of residence : No transgender person shall be separated from parents or immediate family on the ground of being a transgender
Government is mandated to formulate welfare schemes for transgender persons.
National Council for Transgender Persons is sought to be established.
Offences : Compelling a transgender person to indulge in begging or bonded labour is made an offence. Also, denial of right of public passage
to a transgender and forcing such a person to leave household are made offences
The Bill is stated to be introduced as per the 2014 judgment of the SC in NALSA v Union of India, which recognized transgender identity.
Concerns Flagged Over The Bill
Several members objected to many clauses of the Bill.
Dr. Shashi Tharoor MP said that the Bill wrongly assumed that all persons with intersex variations will be transgenders. He also objected to the
requirement imposed by the Bill to get a certificate of identity from the District Magisrate.
“Self-identification as transgender should be the only basis. My amendment expressly forbids subjecting transgender persons to a physical
examination & ensures all transgender persons are protected against discrimination, even those who may not have a certificate of identity”,
Tharoor said in a tweet.
It was also pointed out that corresponding amendments should be made in several other laws like IPC to include trasngeders. For example,
definition of rape under Section 376 IPC deals with crime committed against a female.
Supriya Sule (NCP) said a transgender commission at the national level was not enough. “We are asking for a welfare board for transgenders.
They need equal rights,” she said, demanding a helpline number for the community.
The provisions mandating certificate of identity from a District Magistrate for recognition as a transgender are criticised as against the spirit of
NALSA judgment. The SC had upheld the right of transgender person to decide their “self-identified gender”. The criticism is that forcing a
transgender person to undergo screening to establish identity is invasive and insensitive, violating right to privacy and dignity.